讨论:Main Page:简体中文
文學作品[编辑]
我們應收入文學作品如古代詩詞歌賦嗎？ --Lorenzarius 09:01, 26 Nov 2003 (UTC)
- 不過總量會很大的，不如到meta:Wikipedia上問一下吧！--Samuel 10:03, 26 Nov 2003 (UTC)
- 沒有什麼不可以.--Menchi 10:38, 1 Dec 2003 (UTC)
是否可以另外建立一个收集诗歌和古文并加以注释的计划--Shizhao 11:14, 26 Nov 2003 (UTC)
- 注释的話適合wikibooks:。基本上中文高中課本就是如此吧。－Menchi 10:38, 1 Dec 2003 (UTC)
简繁[编辑]
我想這裡應該沒有太多關於简繁體的問題，因爲源文是簡體的保持簡體，原文是繁體的保留繁體。:O--Samuel 10:03, 26 Nov 2003 (UTC)
- 有時間就轉換，沒時間就別轉換。－Menchi 10:38, 1 Dec 2003 (UTC)
我觉得应该保持原文。--枫难寻 08:17, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Following his suggestion the following has been moved from User Talk:Menchi
master index[编辑]
I have written the following at the German Main Page:
- I have been trying to develop a co-ordinated plan for a master catalog of articles in Wikisource. This would allow linking of all articles through all Main Pages. I have been developing the model on the English main page in the purple box. This model would standardize that box while leaving each language free to develop the green box based on its own needs. I would be very pleased if you would develop a German language version of the box on the German main page. This should in turn lead to a series of directly linked pages that could be formated in a parallel manner.
What would you think about doing this for the CJK languages. As I'm trying to develop a master index that covers all languages, we will probably need to have romanized versions of the titles appear with them on the list, even though the link would still be through the original itself. Eclecticology 09:27, 11 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- Mmm... not sure what you're referring to. Is that violet/blue box what ypu're talking about? Main_Page:English#Primary Categories I can't tell what you're going with that. If you show all articles, it'd be a looong list, right? Would that be appropriate on Main Page? --Menchi 09:07, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- Yes that's the box that I am talking about. Yes, it will be a long list, but as they grow, these pages can all be logically subdivided into smaller pages. The top level sort that is actually on a main page should remain fairly short. The authors, for example would soon have separate pages for each letter of the alphabet. It would only be fine on the main page if this were a single language project. Having it on the separate language main pages means that instructions, explanations and directions can be given in that language. To the extent that we need external links to Wikipedia such as for giving the biography for an author or the historical bacgkround for a historical document the links from the separate category pages will be to the encyclopedia page in that language. By co-ordinating the format of these pages, it may also be possible that eventually software could make sure that they remain co-ordinated. Eclecticology 10:19, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- "I have been developing the model..." -- Ever you started it? Those articles listed in the violet box are just meta-documents... And there are like only 5. --Menchi 11:11, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- ?? There are six items in the English violet box, but it's conceivable to have more. They are in a logical order ending with a category for "none-of-the-above". With each category go to the link if "yes", and to the next question if "no". The "meta-documents" as you call them could have several layers. Eclecticology 11:37, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- Oops, it seems like there are more than just "meta-documents" (I was referring to the Wikimedia press release). Ok.. so they are general categories, but the "secondary categories" seem general too, but just subdivision of artsy stuff; whereas primary categories contains math...and election data. The former being very general, the later being very specific. This categorization scheme is kinda hard to follow and is not very comprehensive, how about other sciences...other disciplines? Maybe I just need sometime to get used to it.
- The top item on the list is for any kind of document that gives information about Wikimedia activities, at least to the extent that they belong in this project at all. For now there is only one document, so there is no immediate need for a sub-page. Beyond that, I am certainly open to listen to advice about how it can be made more easily understood; Perhaps I need to write something like "How the violet box works". As for comprehensiveness, I didn't want to start new categories before we had material to put there. One of the uses of the last category is for parking things that don't yet belong anywhere else. If a trend appears for scientific material or for other disciplines, they can be added later. For now I would be satisfied with having the framework in place. --Eclecticology 19:50, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- A detailed explanation on "How the violet box works" would indeed give us a window into your psyche...and informative! --Menchi 04:08, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- The bottom line is, I'm not really into Wikisource project as of now (I'm still more of ye olde WPian), so I'm not really up-to-date with the operations here. I'm not against this data scheme, but due to my lack of paying attention, I'm only starting to kind of get it now. After I get it, I'm not sure if there's much I can do. I haven't been keeping track with the growth of Chinese Wikisource. And I definitely don't know what Japanese and Koreans are doing. Most importantly, I cannot read the native texts of Japanese and Korean, only the Chinese characters they use. So I cannot serve as a coordinator/ambassador for the entire CJK. Communications difficulty. Sorry, that doesn't help you. I should've said this at the beginning, but I was just perplexed by your grand idea. ;-) --Menchi 12:17, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- No problem! Korean does not yet have a link on the main page, so you shouldn't need to start something in a language you don't know. When I look at the history page for the Japanese main page I can now see that you only had one small edit. We should be able to find somebody else for Japanese. That leaves only the Chinese where any help will be appreciated. I see now that the main page has separate links from simplified and traditional Chinese, but both link to the same page. Would there be a plan to have separate indexing for the two Chinese scripts? Thank you. Eclecticology 19:50, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- I recommend co-ordinations plans be discussed in Talk:Main Page:中文. All the current Chinese sysops can understand English and can communicate with you with ease. Although, the replies may not be speedy, because I think most of them, like me, are not paricularly enthusiatic about this project yet. --Menchi 04:08, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Finished move
中文条目的 Category 怎么命名？[编辑]
我看到现在主页上有人加了[[Category:Chinese]]，但我们是否应该考虑使用中文的名称，比如[[Category:中文]]、[[Category:中文诗歌]]？--Xyb 06:14, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
zh.wikisource.org[编辑]
If there is any interest is setting up a Chinese language-domain at Wikisource (zh.wikisource.org), then please list your language here.
Please translate this message into Chinese. Dovi 05:13, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
繁简体[编辑]
是否应该象维基百科一样合并繁简体文章？--Shizhao 09:09, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
whatdous the boxs 否应该象维基 mene.69.115.115.236 20:04, 26 August 2005 (UTC)